Maximal Revenue with Multiple Goods: Nonmonotonicity and Other Observations
نویسندگان
چکیده
Consider the problem of maximizing the revenue from selling a number of goods to a single buyer. We show that, unlike the case of one good, when the buyer’s values for the goods increase the seller’s maximal revenue may well decrease. Next, through simple and transparent examples, we clarify the need for and the use of randomization when maximizing revenue in the multiple-good versus the one-good case. Finally, we provide a characterization of revenue-maximizing mechanisms (more generally, of “seller-favorable” mechanisms) that circumvents nondifferentiability issues. Previous versions: June 2011, November 2012 (Center for Rationality DP-630). See http://www.ma.huji.ac.il/hart/abs/2good-p.html for a presentation that includes some of the results of this paper. Research partially supported by the National Science Foundation (SES-0922535, SES-1227506) and the European Research Council (FP7249159). The authors thank Bob Aumann, Elchanan Ben-Porath, Eddie Dekel, Alex Gershkov, Ilan Kremer, Noam Nisan, Motty Perry, Eyal Winter, and Asher Wolinsky for useful discussions and suggestions. Department of Economics, Institute of Mathematics, and Center for the Study of Rationality, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. E-mail : [email protected] Web site: http://www.ma.huji.ac.il/hart Department of Economics, University of Chicago. E-mail : [email protected] Web site: http://home.uchicago.edu/~preny
منابع مشابه
Revenue monotonicity in deterministic, dominant-strategy combinatorial auctions
In combinatorial auctions using VCG, a seller can sometimes increase revenue by dropping bidders. In this paper we investigate the extent to which this counter-intuitive phenomenon can also occur under other deterministic dominant-strategy combinatorial auction mechanisms. Our main result is that such failures of “revenue monotonicity” can occur under any such mechanism that is weakly maximal—m...
متن کاملCreating competition out of thin air: An experimental study of right-to-choose auctions
This paper presents an experimental study of a mechanism that is commonly used to sell multiple heterogeneous goods. The novel feature of this procedure is that instead of selling each good in a separate auction, the seller executes a single auction in which buyers, who may be interested in completely different goods, compete for the right to choose a good. We provide experimental evidence that...
متن کاملThe Impact of Electronic Goods Trading on Customs Revenue
With the advent of cross-border electronic commerce, an increasing number of products that have been traded physically in the past are now imported digitally. This raises a number of issues, which are currently debated at the international level: should these products be defined as goods or services; which multilateral trade rules should govern them; and, should they remain tariff and tax exemp...
متن کاملRevenue Maximizing Envy-Free Fixed-Price Auctions with Budgets
Traditional incentive-compatible auctions for selling multiple goods to unconstrained and budgeted bidders can discriminate between bidders by selling identical goods at different prices. For this reason, A recent study by Feldman et al. dropped incentive compatibility and turned the attention to revenue maximizing envy-free item-pricing allocations for budgeted bidders. Envy-free allocations w...
متن کاملBounding the optimal revenue of selling multiple goods
Using duality theory techniques we derive simple, closed-form formulas for bounding the optimal revenue of a monopolist selling many heterogeneous goods, in the case where the buyer’s valuations for the items come i.i.d. from a uniform distribution and in the case where they follow independent (but not necessarily identical) exponential distributions. We apply this in order to get in both these...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012